Al Qaeda In Alexandria
The Washington
Times
Editorial
May 12, 2009
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/12/al-qaeda-in-alexandria/print/
Â
It's not every day that a congressman asks for terrorists to
be shipped to his hometown. So we were surprised to see Rep. Jim Moran,
Democrat of Virginia, pen a column entitled "From Guantanamo to Alexandria" in
Saturday's Washington Post. He actually championed the idea of bringing
terrorists like 9-11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed and other al Qaeda
detainees to historic Alexandria.
What's next? Does he want the nuclear waste that Nevada won't take?
Â
We understand why congressmen work to bring federal office
buildings to their district or fight off noisome incineration plants. So we read
Rep. Moran's column with amazement. It simply makes no sense.
Â
While acknowledging that other solutions might be suitable,
Mr. Moran wrote: "Taking the easy route and joining the chorus of those
crying 'not in my backyard' is appealing. But that's not the Alexandria I know and have represented in
Congress for nearly 20 years."
Â
This line of argument would resonate better if Mr. Moran had
not spent years opposing the Mirant's coal-fired Potomac Plant in northern Alexandria. Calling the
plant a "health hazard, environmental danger and major global warming
contributor" in a July 2008 press release, he added "I remain
committed to seeing it closed."
Â
Apparently he defies the "not in my backyard"
crowd only when national security can be undermined in the bargain.
Â
Contrast Mr. Moran's position with the more sensible
approach of Rep. Frank Wolf, a Republican who represents a neighboring district
in Northern Virginia. He wrote Attorney
General Eric H. Holder on March 13 that: "These dangerous individuals simply
cannot be transferred anywhere near large civilian populations."
Â
We don't have to worry about terror attacks, Mr. Moran
breezily assures us, because the federal court house in Alexandria safely held the so-called 20th
hijacker, Zacarias Moussaoui. In other words, why not roll the dice again?
Â
The stakes are higher this time, as Mr. Wolf explained to us
in an editorial board meeting yesterday. The courthouse neighborhood is now
home to the new U.S. Patent and Trademark headquarters, many new condos and
businesses, a popular hotel and boasts a new ramp to the Beltway. With more
people per square foot, the cost of tragedy would be far higher.
Â
And let's not forget the cost of normality. Jailing Mr.
Moussaoui meant reserving an entire wing just for him. With some 250 detainees
at Gitmo, there are not enough jail wings to go around. Yet packing terrorists
together means trouble. In Guantanamo
there are an average of eight attacks on guards per day. How many guards have
to be maimed or wounded before Mr. Moran decides that housing terrorists is a
bad bet?
Â
We are willing to bet that Mr. Moran has not talked to the
guards' union about the benefits of bringing al Qaeda home.
Â
As for home, why should these terrorists be held here in the
shadow of the nation's capital? If they escape or if their charges are
dismissed on a technicality, as already happened with dangerous detainee
Mohammed al-Qahtani, then the seats of our national government and military
establishment will be endangered.
Â
In light of these considerations, Alexandrians have a right
to know what is motivating their congressman. Mr. Moran is a smart man. Would Alexandria get any
additional federal subsidies? Would Northern Virginia
get some other valuable concessions? Or is Mr. Moran merely playing to a
Justice Department that is currently investigating the former PMA lobbying
group that made him one of the top four recipients of its campaign-donation
largesse in recent years?
Â
Mr. Moran has made a career of playing it straight with his
constituents, even when they didn't like what he had to say. So he should step
forward now and tell us: What was he promised in exchange for compromising Virginia's security?
Â
Â
Â